I have taught mostly seniors in high school science for 17 years and, during those years, I have experienced many different learning models. In the end, I have found that all of the new models are based on old paradigms that have stayed true but are difficult to implement in the same way. I am a big proponent of the Montessori Method but I do realize it has its drawbacks for many large public schools. The problem is that, as Siemens (2008) suggests, there is not one “right” theory. I agree with this. I remember learning about Gardner ’s (2010) multiple intelligences when I was in my education classes and thinking that this was the answer to education problems but, in practice, I realize that there is so much more to helping a student learn than just understanding how he learns best. I have come to realize, just as Siemens mentions, that it takes more than one learning theory to bring out the best in a student. We do not have control over so many factors involved in learning that it is imperative that we use the best resources we can to help students achieve their greatest potential.
In many school districts, there is a model based on Brain-compatible learning that I feel has been very helpful to students, or will be if followed as designed. I have included a link to a sample rubric of what the teacher is to try to maintain and you will see there are aspects of many different learning theories involved.
http://www.bsisonline.com/2008/Items%20posted/CogCompClassRubric%20Elemen%2092208.pdf
The first order of business in a Brain-compatible classroom is to make it more like your home. Bring in pretty plants, lamp lighting, couches etc. to make the environment more comfortable for the students ( Wilson , 2009). Behaviorists feel that the environment shapes behavior and in this case the idea is that making a student feel more comfortable will cause them to want to learn more (Robert, 2010). The environment changes their behavior based on the fact that they want to be there and the surroundings are more familiar. This is also demonstrated by the idea of immediate feedback which gives the students the operant conditioning that behaviorists feel is an integral part of the learning process. *
Keeping students actively engaged is an integral part of this new model introduced in my school district, which is a tenet of the constructivist theory (Robert, 2010). Students learn best when actually experiencing the processes they are trying to understand. The new Brain- compatible model does not leave out the cognitive theory because teachers allow students the time to reflect on the work they have done, and to find connections from previous knowledge to help them acquire new knowledge. This reflective thinking process requires adequate time and the new model tries to make sure the teacher allows the time required in the learning process.
Nothing mentioned above is new but the idea of trying to use all of these things in one classroom situation is good practice. I think that each learning-theory behaviorist, constructivist, or cognitive has aspects that are necessary in a working classroom. That is why I mentioned the Brain-compatible classroom information. It is the first model I have been asked to use in a classroom that tries to incorporate different schools of thought. Schools only work when parents, teachers, and students work together and the same thing is true with learning theories.
References
Gardner, H. (2010). Multiple Intelligences. Retrieved June 10th, 2011, from Nine intelligences: http://skyview.vansd.org/lschmidt/Projects/The%20Nine%20Types%20of%20Intelligence.htm
Robert, D. (2010). Learning Theories. Retrieved June 10th, 2011, from Paradigms: http://www.learning-theories.com/
Siemens, G. (2008, January 27). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers. Paper presented to ITFORUM. Retrieved September 13, 2010, from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/Paper105/Siemens.pdf .
Wilson, L. (2009). overview of brain based Education. Retrieved June 10th, 2011, from Brain Based Overview: http://www.uwsp.edu/education/lwilson/brain/bboverview.htm
Debbie,
ReplyDeleteIn reviewing the rubric posted above one item really stuck out to me right away: the environment - learning and cultural environment is weighted heavily. I find this very interesting, and as you point out it makes sense. Chevalier (2007) also stresses the importance of environmental factors when implementing successful management practices. Many times environmental factors have the greatest influence but are often ignore and resources are thought to influence success more often than not.
Reference:
Chevalier, R. D. (2007). A manager's guide to improving workplace performance. New York, NY: American Management Association.
Thanks for sharing your story and thoughts they have helped my understanding!
Candice Jones
Dear Debbie,
ReplyDeleteI was enthralled by some of the resources. I gained more information on principles for optimal learning from the brain based education document, with a focus on the teaching elements of orchestrated immersion, relaxed alertness, and active processing.
Thanks for sharing.
Regards
Ronke
Debbie
ReplyDeleteI agree that immediate feedback is necessary for a child to be successful. What do you expect the student to do with the feedback and how do you gauge if the child learned from the feedback?
Sandra
Test
ReplyDeleteI just spent three hours trying to figure out why I could not respond to your responses or anyone else that uses bloggerspot. I finally decided to use google chrome and it worked. I was using IE before and I never could get it to work. Hence the test above. Now I know it works.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comments to my blog. In response to Sandra: I tend to use formative assessment tools for immediate feedback. At my school we are required to write the essential question on the board everyday. I decided to use this as part of my formative assessment each day. I have many markers in the room and when we are about 75% finished with the lesson I will ask them to write their response to the essential question on the board. They really enjoy it and we discuss their responses as a class. They have no fears about putting the wrong answer because there is no wrong answer only different versions of the right answer. We discuss the different versions of their answers and why some answers are more accepted than others or what we can do to make different answers easier to understand. Occasionally I get a board full of I do not understand in different versions and I know it is time to reteach.
ReplyDeleteDebbie Stripling
Debbie,
ReplyDeleteYour post was very informative and I do agree that learning and teaching models are just recycled. We had a teacher in our school who used the lights and comfortable room idea. I didn't realize there was research to back up her ideas. I do know her room was the most comfortable room in the school and the principal visited it as often as possible. The principal said she enjoyed sitting in the rocking chair as she watch the interaction in the room. I do know the administration felt this teacher was a good teacher. I am not sure how her students did, but the administration raved about her teaching skill.
Aimee
I noticed that Aimee mentioned where she posted. I thought I better do it too just in case. I posted at K.Steele, Marion's blog, Aimee's blog, karen Connell, and Sandra C Johnson's blog so far.
ReplyDeleteI also thought I should mention that I, Debbie Stripling, am amoalf.
ReplyDelete